PAD020098 PAD020098 12/24/25 21061024) Provide compust on the spelope side of the sock here to make them ABACT 211.1024X5 Provide scoor protection where temporary dunnel 4 outlets so the receiving stream. 212.81024x Provide the details for proposed channels in the E&S drawing 213.81024bxxix A detail was provided for a vepruned channel (channel #5) in the EAS set, but this channel could not be located on the drawings and calculations are not provided. Please addres 2141102.5x5xx A5 ft. bem is labeled on the plan, but grading is not shown, and no calculations have been provided Show all proposed grading, provide a dri pporting calculations, and provide the construction detail wed for be 2154102 405 -37- 12/24/25 d in Module 2. Long-term protection also has not been included in the This is a not i plans with a conation te Street woeping is chocked in the PCSM section, but this is not identified in Module 2. Explai All the bioretention facilities are identified as "inden in Mohle 2, but there is a design infitrion rate Module) also includes Rain Garden with Infiancion as being checked, which in at with what is proposed on the site Module 3 identifies rooftop drain disconnect as being siled on the site, but this is also nowhere y reflect t ebe in the application or drawings an is proposed for both FAS and PCSM theold Revise Module 330e end detail identifies de engency spillway 58. wide based on E&S design criteria 45 Explain why a rock filer is needed between channels 1 and 2, as they both will to a sediment basis 221.3102.40 Several sections of reinforced slopes are shown near the ridge of the site, the insufficiens room for access construction of this in soms of proximity to the proposed CFS loca Additionally, the wes draining to these sections of CFS has been averaged over a much longer than the immodic per slepe. Evaluate whether the CFS siring is appropriate for the amou slope in the drainage 22241024x5 Tempesty haal mads on previously existing access paths are stilland for the Will these be removed and seas rested to vegetation density on the plans in the sequence happen to the road 223.81024x1024x5x1024): Antidegradation Module 3 ms to addres The EAS page idensifies a compost filter berm to be utilized this is not represented drawings, etc. for the project Explain why this is checked Protec Uliae Natural Flow Pathways on-site has been chocked in the PCSM secti how the came design is doing this considering the mouts of Ch 105 impacts th PAID ADVERTISEMENT IT'S TIME TO BUILD! A New QV High School On Beaver Street, Leetsdale 12/24/2025 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Charlie Gauthier Quaker Valley School District 100 Lectsdale Industrial Drive Lectsdale, PA, 15056 gauthierc@qvad.org Re: Technical Deficiency Letter (TDL) Quaker Valley School District NPDES Permit Application No. PAD020098 Leet Township, Lectsdale & Edgeworth Boroughs, Allegheny County Dear Charlie Gauthier. The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has reviewed the above referenced application and has identified the technical deficiencies listed below. The Peneryfania Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual (E&S Manual) and the Peenrylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual (BMP Manual) include information that may aid you in responding to some of the deficiencies listed below. The deficiencies are based on applicable laws and regulations, and the guidance sets forth DEP's established means of satisfying the applicable regulatory and statutory requirements The technical deficiencies void the permit decision guarantee and any agreements that have been made regarding the timeline for the permit application review. DEP will continue to follow the permit review process procedures in the review and processing of this permit application You must submit a response fully addressing each of the technical deficiencies set forth above. Please note that this information must be received within 30 calendar days froes the date of this letter, on or before 1/23/26 or DEP may deny or withdraw the application. Alternatively, you may consider a voluntary withdrawal. Please submit copies of the revised information to the Allegheny County Conservation District and to the DEP. Be advised that submissions to the County Conservation Districts should follow the process used by that District. Submissions to DEP should utilize the Public Upload Tool. It is suggested that the DEP plan reviewer is contacted via email upon resubmission Please be advised that if your response does not satisfy the technical deficiencies, in general your NOT or application will proceed to an Elevated Review. If you do not believe the technical deficiencies can be fully addressed within the required timeframe, you should consider a voluntary withdrawal, If a permit application is denied, there is no recovery of fees available, however, if you voluntarily withdraw the NOI or application and then submit a new Phone: 412.442.4000 F 4324424242400 Waterfront Drive Pitsburgh, PA 15222dIR.BLARY 8 PADEP/ACCD Deficiency Letters in 1 Year & Still NO Joint Water Obstruction and Encroachment Permit Still 223 Deficiencies After one year since QVSD submitted applications to: PA Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) Allegheny County Conservation District (ACCD) Scan QR code for more information For the full letter enumerating the 223 deficiencies: https://bit.ly/cgs-letter DEP Quaker Valley High School Campus Website: https://bit.ly/cgs-qvsd 8 Years and STILL NO New High School and NOT Even STATE & LOCAL Permits! -Citizens for a Great School Paid for by Citizens for a Great School https://bit.ly/c4ags-signup hello@c4ags.org PO Box 555, Sewickley, PA 15143 Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, or X FOX PAD020098 PAD020098 12/24/25 21061024 ) Provide compust on the spelope side of the sock here to make them ABACT 211.1024X5 Provide scoor protection where temporary dunnel 4 outlets so the receiving stream . 212.81024x Provide the details for proposed channels in the E & S drawing 213.81024bxxix A detail was provided for a vepruned channel ( channel # 5 ) in the EAS set , but this channel could not be located on the drawings and calculations are not provided . Please addres 2141102.5x5xx A5 ft . bem is labeled on the plan , but grading is not shown , and no calculations have been provided Show all proposed grading , provide a dri pporting calculations , and provide the construction detail wed for be 2154102 405 -37- 12/24/25 d in Module 2. Long - term protection also has not been included in the This is a not i plans with a conation te Street woeping is chocked in the PCSM section , but this is not identified in Module 2. Explai All the bioretention facilities are identified as " inden in Mohle 2 , but there is a design infitrion rate Module ) also includes Rain Garden with Infiancion as being checked , which in at with what is proposed on the site Module 3 identifies rooftop drain disconnect as being siled on the site , but this is also nowhere y reflect t ebe in the application or drawings an is proposed for both FAS and PCSM theold Revise Module 330e end detail identifies de engency spillway 58. wide based on E & S design criteria 45 Explain why a rock filer is needed between channels 1 and 2 , as they both will to a sediment basis 221.3102.40 Several sections of reinforced slopes are shown near the ridge of the site , the insufficiens room for access construction of this in soms of proximity to the proposed CFS loca Additionally , the wes draining to these sections of CFS has been averaged over a much longer than the immodic per slepe . Evaluate whether the CFS siring is appropriate for the amou slope in the drainage 22241024x5 Tempesty haal mads on previously existing access paths are stilland for the Will these be removed and seas rested to vegetation density on the plans in the sequence happen to the road 223.81024x1024x5x1024 ) : Antidegradation Module 3 ms to addres The EAS page idensifies a compost filter berm to be utilized this is not represented drawings , etc. for the project Explain why this is checked Protec Uliae Natural Flow Pathways on - site has been chocked in the PCSM secti how the came design is doing this considering the mouts of Ch 105 impacts th PAID ADVERTISEMENT IT'S TIME TO BUILD ! A New QV High School On Beaver Street , Leetsdale 12/24/2025 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Charlie Gauthier Quaker Valley School District 100 Lectsdale Industrial Drive Lectsdale , PA , 15056 gauthierc@qvad.org Re : Technical Deficiency Letter ( TDL ) Quaker Valley School District NPDES Permit Application No. PAD020098 Leet Township , Lectsdale & Edgeworth Boroughs , Allegheny County Dear Charlie Gauthier . The Department of Environmental Protection ( DEP ) has reviewed the above referenced application and has identified the technical deficiencies listed below . The Peneryfania Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual ( E & S Manual ) and the Peenrylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual ( BMP Manual ) include information that may aid you in responding to some of the deficiencies listed below . The deficiencies are based on applicable laws and regulations , and the guidance sets forth DEP's established means of satisfying the applicable regulatory and statutory requirements The technical deficiencies void the permit decision guarantee and any agreements that have been made regarding the timeline for the permit application review . DEP will continue to follow the permit review process procedures in the review and processing of this permit application You must submit a response fully addressing each of the technical deficiencies set forth above . Please note that this information must be received within 30 calendar days froes the date of this letter , on or before 1/23/26 or DEP may deny or withdraw the application . Alternatively , you may consider a voluntary withdrawal . Please submit copies of the revised information to the Allegheny County Conservation District and to the DEP . Be advised that submissions to the County Conservation Districts should follow the process used by that District . Submissions to DEP should utilize the Public Upload Tool . It is suggested that the DEP plan reviewer is contacted via email upon resubmission Please be advised that if your response does not satisfy the technical deficiencies , in general your NOT or application will proceed to an Elevated Review . If you do not believe the technical deficiencies can be fully addressed within the required timeframe , you should consider a voluntary withdrawal , If a permit application is denied , there is no recovery of fees available , however , if you voluntarily withdraw the NOI or application and then submit a new Phone : 412.442.4000 F 4324424242400 Waterfront Drive Pitsburgh , PA 15222dIR.BLARY 8 PADEP / ACCD Deficiency Letters in 1 Year & Still NO Joint Water Obstruction and Encroachment Permit Still 223 Deficiencies After one year since QVSD submitted applications to : PA Department of Environmental Protection ( PADEP ) Allegheny County Conservation District ( ACCD ) Scan QR code for more information For the full letter enumerating the 223 deficiencies : https://bit.ly/cgs-letter DEP Quaker Valley High School Campus Website : https://bit.ly/cgs-qvsd 8 Years and STILL NO New High School and NOT Even STATE & LOCAL Permits ! -Citizens for a Great School Paid for by Citizens for a Great School https://bit.ly/c4ags-signup hello@c4ags.org PO Box 555 , Sewickley , PA 15143 Follow us on Facebook , Instagram , or X FOX