Even in the depths of space, there’s no escape from politics.
The $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope is parked 1 million miles away. In the nearly three years since it became operational, “Webb,” as it’s called, has made some incredible findings.
Webb uses infrared scanning to show how stars and galaxies form and to study the atmospheres of distant planets. Its capabilities complement the aging Hubble Space Telescope, which orbits Earth at an altitude of only 340 miles or so.
Alas, like so much of the country’s ongoing scientific research, Webb is at risk of being defunded.
President Donald Trump’s administration has removed NASA’s top scientist and proposed a nearly 50% budget cut to the agency’s Science Mission Directorate, which oversees planetary science, astrophysics research and more.
While NASA’s proposed budget retains some funding for the Hubble and Webb telescopes, they could become practically useless given the cuts planned.
Pointing these gadgets at the right targets to obtain useful data is no simple feat. Without a critical mass of scientists “the science from these instruments stops,” Daniel Holz, astrophysicist at the University of Chicago, told the Chicago Tribune. “It’s just not viable if these cuts go through anywhere near what’s proposed. There is no bare-bones mode to run these highly complex, state-of-the-art facilities.”
The Trump administration’s planned cuts at NASA are being repeated at other agencies employing scientists to do everything from vetting new prescription drugs to predicting hurricane landfalls. Similarly, Trump’s pressure campaign on elite universities uses federal research funding as leverage, in some cases threatening to destroy years of work by disrupting long-term studies.
These cuts are aimed at gaining control over institutions likely to push back against Trump’s agenda by citing inconvenient truths: Climate change is no hoax and vaccines save millions of lives.
Big cuts at NASA would play into the hands of America’s rivals across the globe. China and Europe are working aggressively to overtake the American lead in science and technology, and actively recruiting top scientists who feel under siege in the U.S.
On a practical level, attacks on scientific research could undermine the nation’s ability to cure diseases, upgrade defense systems, or make computers and phones work better in the future. Critical risks — even world-ending threats — would be more likely to go unmitigated without the science to accurately assess them.
Along with researching gravitational waves, Holz heads the Science and Security Board at the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists responsible for setting the legendary “Doomsday Clock,” which ticks closer to midnight as the risk of Armageddon increases.
The clock, based at the University of Chicago, lost much of its relevance when the Cold War ended. Unfortunately, it’s relevant again today and stands at the closest point to doomsday in its 80-year history.
Last fall, Holz’s board decided to move the clock one second closer to midnight, announcing in January that the world was only 89 seconds away. Since then, he said, the group has been following the administration’s actions and it’s alarmed by the broad and deep attacks on science.
The board reserves the right to change the clock at any time, Holz said, not just annually. Anyone interested will need to stay tuned, but we’re willing to bet that if the clock moves any time soon, it will be moving closer to doomsday.